Author Topic: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!  (Read 532 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zirconia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #40 on: July 25, 2020, 07:37:30 PM »
Complete, Karen,

I guess it's best I reply to both of you. Because once again strife does distress me. Although I doubt anything I say can cause reconciliation.

And... do forgive me if my thoughts are a bit woozy after chocolate rum cake and champagne... I may not be in my very best form right now.

Karen. I think it's great that you are ignoring me. I really wish you would/could. I really wish I could believe you, but gee....why do l find that so hard to believe. The entire focus of your latest response is a lengthy justification of your ill will towards someone who did things differently for apparently different reasons. Just because you judge my outcome to have been "better than" yours, is not my doing. It is yours.
Also, l am very sorry about how you feel, not only about me, but apparently about how you feel about your own current status or situation.

Karen... Complete's words are sincere. She truly feels for you and wishes your situation could be different. As do I. Differences in opinion do not preclude compassion.
Whether your believe my words or hers is up to you. But she's expressed her sorrow to me privately as well. In words gentler than mine.


Guru???? That's hilarious! Never have l been seen like that before, but l guess that is just another reflection of how you see things from your own particular perspective.
Nevertheless, l see that remark as highly disrespectful of Zirconia's own abilities to perceive things as they are from her perspective, which is obviously much different from yours.

Complete... thank you for your attestation to my competence.

And Karen... In what sense do you use the word guru? I've not once viewed Complete as my master nor myself as her disciple... so I did feel a bit offended by it, but maybe the ways we define the word differ. To me Complete is someone who's been through the path I knew I needed but thought impossible. We met through some incredible miracle, and equally miraculously had enough in common that my feelings toward her are like toward an elder sister. Respected and loved but not infallible.

Again! You are attributing magical mind control powers to me which l simply do not possess while at the same time denigrating Zirconia and her own obviously superior ability to arrive at her own conclusions.

Yes...

Karen, during the brief time I've known you, I've received more guidance and direction from you than I have from Complete during the entirety of the time I've known her.

Unlike you, she, has mostly just listened to me and been there. First as I cried, and later as I untangled the knotted wreaths of my pain... at times showing surprise at my conclusions. Never leading me—except by existing. Meaning that as I choose my path based on where I am, I consider what is the most likely to allow me to arrive to a similar destination.

As I believe you did... albeit encumbered by more shackles to hold you. I can't but admire your strength and compassion.

Karen l really must apologize to you for failing yet again apparently, to express my thoughts clearly to you. Could it be that English is my second language and l an still lacking in my grammatical or writing skills? Or...is it that you are so overcome with negative emotions towards someone you do not even know, that her words are just to "triggering"?
Nevertheless, l will make yet another attempt to correct your gross misinterpretation/misrepresentations of my words.
If you go back and read my earlier post regarding your "transition in place", you will note that, despite the fact that l know very little about this process, l continue to see the chances of attaining true stealth to be infintesimally small without leaving the entirety of your previous life behind you.
Now, to be clear, l am not arguing the impossibility of such an occurrence. I am simply stating that l am of the opinion that the chances are not good.
Sure. Some people have actually walked on the moon. But look at the effort involved: the personal sacrifices made. Just because they did, does not mean you or l can.
What l see happening is something l have absolutely no control of. I wrote words with the intent of conveying my thoughts or opinion. Then...you..."basically *take* that as meaning", something completely different.
What's that all about?

Complete, Karen...

Yes... I do believe there is a language barrier. I myself may be a native speaker of English by definition—but not by birth. And part of my work has always been to interpret nuances. The barriers I see are not only linguistic... but also affected by culture and predispositions.

Here I believe we must go back to "the community" and its effects on those who dwell there.

Karen, you told me you always saw two camps warring about stealth vs. out and proud. As an aside, I confess I found it irritating that you felt what you'd seen nullified the overwhelming support of being in the open I did... but in the end both amount to the same thing. Because to me even stealth felt inadequate. Northern Jane described it as an intermediary stage between passing and assimilation... and assimilation is the only thing that can possibly bring me peace.

The point being that the community sees transition as an arduous/exciting/whatever journey of discovery and learning. Complete, however, experienced it as a door through which she stepped to the other side.

As for me... I now see I stood inside that doorway for much longer than I can remember, at first correcting people who thought me female, or accepting their apologies when they found out with an "I really don't mind," and eventually, hesitantly, guiltily embracing the categorization. Because I still knew I was male.

So I found the laborious/joyful/whatever processes of "becoming a woman" on the forums confusing and distressing. If you read my previous post you probably saw whence my despair was born. If I was not a woman, to me going through those processes would only be like rehearsing for a role. It would not make me what I was not.

Do you see the difference?

Complete was told by the doctors they could not change her brain, but they could align her body to match it. So she had it done, and continued her life. To me everyone on the forums—whether promoting stealth or openness—appears to at least initially be working at being a woman.

And what the doctors told me released me from the curse laid on me at the age of three. If I was a girl regardless of my defective body, it was the cause of my ostracism when growing up. And the pain I'd felt throughout. I was not becoming anything else through accepting treatment. I was just correcting that defect.

The moment I was able to fully accept that I was free. Free to accept how people saw me. Free to move the way my body led me to. Free to not consider how a man must speak in any situation... but to just express what I felt. There were no arduous processes. There was no learning. No rehearsal. I finally felt free to accept being seen and treated female. Even free to for the first time wear overtly "female" articles... since they no longer were a masquerade costume. Just socially accepted attire for a woman.

So... we see transition from different perspectives. Which makes it look different. Had I accepted and followed what I saw on the forums I would now be engaged in a different struggle than I am. And would feel different. What I'm doing now is a leap of faith. I trust myself to succeed like a bird jumping out of the nest for the first time. Fearful, but at the same time somehow knowing that my wings will carry me.

And in fact they are carrying me. As far as the forums are concerned I've arrived. According to the "community" definitions I "pass." But the core of my pain remains. I am not whole. I cannot respond when someone wants to make love to me. First because I have the wrong equipment. And second, the fact that I'm desired despite of that emphasizes my incompleteness.

My discrepancy has always been physical. As I believe Complete's was as well. At least to me everything else is just ancillary. For now I am able to live with it because I'm working to get the funds to remedy the situation. And the knowledge that it will happen affords me peace.

I am very sorry l feel that way. Can you help me, or explain to me how l can not make you feel that way when l have to disagree with you based on my experience, which is necessarily different from yours.

Yes. And true... As I see it, it's a result of Complete being a product of a different culture. Since when she sought treatment there was no "community" to mold (or confuse) her. Thus, she finds expressing things in its language more difficult than I do.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2020, 12:38:34 AM by zirconia »

Offline karen_A

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #41 on: July 26, 2020, 10:09:41 AM »

Quote from: Complete
Karen. I think it's great that you are ignoring me. I really wish you would/could. I really wish I could believe you, but gee....why do l find that so hard to believe. The entire focus of your latest response is a lengthy justification of your ill will towards someone who did things differently for apparently different reasons. Just because you judge my outcome to have been "better than" yours, is not my doing. It is yours.
Also, l am very sorry about how you feel, not only about me, but apparently about how you feel about your own current status or situation.
Karen... Complete's words are sincere. She truly feels for you and wishes your situation could be different. As do I.

Again a closer examination of her words suggests otherwise. She writes in way that is designed to raise emotional hackles... in other words baiting... and she is good at it... take for example the above. It starts out calling me a liar (without knowing WHEN I put her on ignore in the board software- and she is on my ignore list here). Then she imputes my heartfelt explanation of how and why my life has gone as it has, is somehow about some sort of imagined ill will I have towards her.

I don't know her or the details of her life... I don't know if her life has been better or worst than mine overall, and either way it has no bearing on mine.

I do know she made comments in the past here implying that my transitioning in place was a mistake... I can go back and find quotes if I need to. What I feel about my situation has nothing to do with anyone else's situation and does not affect how i see anyone else...

I have had both good and bad online relationships with people with experiences like her... It's about how the person interacts with me. Life is too short to keep arguing with someone who tends to try and inflame emotions using loaded words.

Quote
Differences in opinion do not preclude compassion.
True... but that is usually evident from how someone responds to you.

Quote
And Karen... In what sense do you use the word guru? I've not once viewed Complete as my master nor myself as her disciple...

It sounded me from what you posted previously that she helped you sort out your confusion.


Quote
Karen, during the brief time I've known you, I've received more guidance and direction from you than I have from Complete during the entirety of the time I've known her.

Don't mistake suggesting things to be considered as the same thing as  suggesting specific courses of actions... My purpose when i say the types of things is to help make sure someone is not having tunnel vision cause by wanting something very very much... It's not to persuade or dissuade from a specific course, just to try and make sure they are seeing the whole picture.

Some of things you have posted here and at Susan's made me wonder if you did not have some degree of tunnel vision.

Quote
Yes... I do believe there is a language barrier. I myself may be a native speaker of English by definition—but not by birth. And part of my work has always been to interpret nuances. The barriers I see are not only linguistic... but also affected by culture and predispositions.

Without knowing what culture you were brought up in, it's hard for me to understand it's consequences.

Quote
Karen, you told me you always saw two camps warring about stealth vs. out and proud. As an aside, I confess I found it irritating that you felt what you'd seen nullified the overwhelming support of being in the open I did...

After the rise of TG philosophy the "community" became very fractured.

I transitioned in a different time than now, and in general I have been mostly in forums that were primarily TS focused rather than general TG.

Quote
but in the end both amount to the same thing. Because to me even stealth felt inadequate.

For life in the long run I equate stealth with assimilation because without assimilation stealth would feel like a straightjacket...  It would be a hard work rather than just "being" which is (or should be) the point of transition... Without assimilation, stealth would not be emotionally sustainable IMO.

Of course that brings up the question of one needs to be stealth for assimilation... In general I think so, but some disagree.

Quote
The point being that the community sees transition as an arduous/exciting/whatever journey of discovery and learning.

For many it certainly is like a step off a cliff not knowing for sure if there is a lake underneath or just rocks... I think age at transition I think has big effect on that... Quiet frankly I never understood those that wait until they aer in their 60's to transition... in fact I thought the age I transitioned was already awfully late to be able to have a normal life and really assimilate (even outside of passing issues)  because so much of life and formational experiences have passed.

Quote
As for me... I now see I stood inside that doorway for much longer than I can remember, at first correcting people who thought me female

Never happened to me before being on HRT and completing electrolysis while presenting male... When that did occasionally happen before transitioning, of course I did not correct people.

Quote
If I was not a woman, to me going through those processes would only be like rehearsing for a role. It would not make me what I was not.

Many see it as a time learning the things they did not learn because they were brought up as male. After all females are not born with know all aspects of the social role society assigns to females... and it takes them to figure out how best they fit in... that is what being teenager is supposed to be about.

Fro myself  I always was aware that I was lacking teh socialization of females in this culture... but I was also lacking significant part of male socialization because of teh situation was in growing up.

Quote
Complete was told by the doctors they could not change her brain, but they could align her body to match it. So she had it done, and continued her life. To me everyone on the forums—whether promoting stealth or openness—appears to at least initially be working at being a woman.

Human being are a combination of nature and nurture- the degree varies by individual but no one is fully immune to either ... Nurture/socialization does affect how one acts and interacts with society, and age at transition does have a significant effect on how much the socialization affects one.

Quote
There was no learning.

I have to say I think there may be a bit of tunnel vision with that... I have a hard time believing anyone really knows the totality of a social role they were not brought up in from the first day of fully living in it... As I said there is a learning curve even for those brought up as girls.

Quote
And would feel different. What I'm doing now is a leap of faith. I trust myself to succeed like a bird jumping out of the nest for the first time. Fearful, but at the same time somehow knowing that my wings will carry me.

I hope it works out for you.

Quote
As far as the forums are concerned I've arrived. According to the "community" definitions I "pass." But the core of my pain remains. I am not whole. I cannot respond when someone wants to make love to me. First because I have the wrong equipment. And second, the fact that I'm desired despite of that emphasizes my incompleteness.

Having someone being physically attracted to me in either sex is not something I have a lot experience with. In any case I have never felt good about my body (still don't), and that did not help me take care of it.


Quote
My discrepancy has always been physical.

While we are not exactly talking about the same thing as for me it went beyond what a between my legs, the physical has always been a big issue for me.

Quote
Yes. And true... As I see it, it's a result of Complete being a product of a different culture. Since when she sought treatment there was no "community" to mold (or confuse) her. Thus, she finds expressing things in its language more difficult than I do.

As i said I've known a number from Complete's era... and i think our ages are not very different so  If so we were brought up at about teh same times, though in very different circumstances.

I was not molded by the TG community nor confused by it. I never lived and socialized in it outside of attending some support groups in teh first few years. My course was based on what i thought stood the best chance of working for me.

I don't hate Complete, I just don't think with engaging her is a good use of my time and energy based on the tone of her responses to me.

BTW when I looked at old posts here, it also looks like she is the reason Elizabeth (AKA Lisa) left - though I did not do a deep dive to figure out what happened there.

-Karen

Offline Complete

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 259
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #42 on: July 26, 2020, 11:27:04 AM »
Karen....oh, Karen...
Here's a NEWS FLASH for you.
I AM NOT BAITING YOU. I AM CALLING OUT YOUR CHILDISH PETULANCE AND RESENTFUL PASSIVE AGGRESSIVENESS.
I have no need to call you a liar. Your words speak much more loudly.
I few days ago, on post #37 you wrote:
Quote
First I have Complete on ignore. While, if I have the time and energy. I will discuss differences respectfully, at this stage of my life I don't feel the need to discuss differences with those that don't.
I unless l am totally misreading your words, you are clearly stating thatyou "are ignoring me !!!
Hmmm.....
Yesterday, in post #39, l replied:
Quote
Karen. I think it's great that you are ignoring me. I really wish you would/could. I really wish I could believe you, but gee....why do l find that so hard to believe. The entire focus of your latest response is a lengthy justification of your ill will towards someone who did things differently for apparently different reasons. Just because you judge my outcome to have been "better than" yours, is not my doing. It is yours.
Also, l am very sorry about how you feel, not only about me, but apparently about how you feel about your own current status or situation.

Yet it is YOU who has the chutzpah to call me the liar.
I am beginning to see that your "issues" go far beyond your "gender dysphoria".
Nevertheless, my feeling for you have not changed. I will continue to wish you well and respect your efforts to make the best of your present circumstances.
In addition l will continue to disagree with anyone who generalizes their own experience and projects their own negative feelings and thoughts onto others.
Do have a better day and best of luck ignoring my comments.

Offline zirconia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #43 on: July 26, 2020, 09:10:41 PM »
Karen,

I don't have very much time because I need to work. My apologies if I'm not able to reply clearly enough.

I have had both good and bad online relationships with people with experiences like her... It's about how the person interacts with me. Life is too short to keep arguing with someone who tends to try and inflame emotions using loaded words.

I guess I've done what I can... and as I see Complete responded as well I perhaps should in this reply concern myself only with all else.

It sounded me from what you posted previously that she helped you sort out your confusion.

Did you find my description unclear? If so, please consider the relationship between yourself and your brother. Is it that of master and disciple?

Alternatively, think of those who have stayed by you as you cried, responding to your grief not with platitudes but with absolute honesty and concern? Are they your masters?

Don't mistake suggesting things to be considered as the same thing as  suggesting specific courses of actions... My purpose when i say the types of things is to help make sure someone is not having tunnel vision cause by wanting something very very much... It's not to persuade or dissuade from a specific course, just to try and make sure they are seeing the whole picture.

By saying this do you imply Complete persuaded or dissuaded me from a specific course?

Some of things you have posted here and at Susan's made me wonder if you did not have some degree of tunnel vision.

Judging from your comment below it would appear you now not only wonder... but also suspect I may.

Without knowing what culture you were brought up in, it's hard for me to understand it's consequences.

I understand. That is all right.

After the rise of TG philosophy the "community" became very fractured.

I transitioned in a different time than now, and in general I have been mostly in forums that were primarily TS focused rather than general TG.

Does that change what I saw where I visited, how it made me feel, or the fact that you repeatedly responded to me by saying what you saw during your thirty years where you frequented differed? Or make your observations from back then more relevant to what mine have been in the present?

For life in the long run I equate stealth with assimilation because without assimilation stealth would feel like a straightjacket...  It would be a hard work rather than just "being" which is (or should be) the point of transition... Without assimilation, stealth would not be emotionally sustainable IMO.

I feel Northern Jane's definition is a good one.

Of course that brings up the question of one needs to be stealth for assimilation... In general I think so, but some disagree.

I fail to understand the relevance of this to the subject at hand.

For many it certainly is like a step off a cliff not knowing for sure if there is a lake underneath or just rocks... I think age at transition I think has big effect on that... Quiet frankly I never understood those that wait until they aer in their 60's to transition... in fact I thought the age I transitioned was already awfully late to be able to have a normal life and really assimilate (even outside of passing issues)  because so much of life and formational experiences have passed.

I fail to understand the relevance of this to the subject at hand.

Never happened to me before being on HRT and completing electrolysis while presenting male... When that did occasionally happen before transitioning, of course I did not correct people.

The stories we see everywhere do differ in many ways.

Many see it as a time learning the things they did not learn because they were brought up as male. After all females are not born with know all aspects of the social role society assigns to females... and it takes them to figure out how best they fit in... that is what being teenager is supposed to be about.

I'm sure many do see it as such.

Fro myself  I always was aware that I was lacking teh socialization of females in this culture... but I was also lacking significant part of male socialization because of teh situation was in growing up.

To live like that until transition must have been truly hard.

Human being are a combination of nature and nurture- the degree varies by individual but no one is fully immune to either ... Nurture/socialization does affect how one acts and interacts with society, and age at transition does have a significant effect on how much the socialization affects one.

To which the story of John/Joan may or may not attest.

I have to say I think there may be a bit of tunnel vision with that... I have a hard time believing anyone really knows the totality of a social role they were not brought up in from the first day of fully living in it... As I said there is a learning curve even for those brought up as girls.

I in general advocate viewing the entire section for context rather than plucking out a single item. So if you don't mind let's read it again:

And what the doctors told me released me from the curse laid on me at the age of three. If I was a girl regardless of my defective body, it was the cause of my ostracism when growing up. And the pain I'd felt throughout. I was not becoming anything else through accepting treatment. I was just correcting that defect.

The moment I was able to fully accept that I was free. Free to accept how people saw me. Free to move the way my body led me to. Free to not consider how a man must speak in any situation... but to just express what I felt. There were no arduous processes. There was no learning. No rehearsal. I finally felt free to accept being seen and treated female. Even free to for the first time wear overtly "female" articles... since they no longer were a masquerade costume. Just socially accepted attire for a woman.


What was my message? What did I say happened? How did it change things?

If in your view something I did learn made it possible, what do you feel it was?

Or... perhaps you judge what I described to be mere delusion? If so, please be honest, and also justify your conclusion. ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶


I hope it works out for you.

Thank you.♡

Having someone being physically attracted to me in either sex is not something I have a lot experience with. In any case I have never felt good about my body (still don't), and that did not help me take care of it.

It's startling when one is still holding on to being male. Later, disconcerting—especially when those who are know one's past. Indescribably exciting when it is someone whose mere presence in the room makes one's whole body sing and breathing labored. And made incredibly frustrating by having to refuse despite wanting it more than anything—because accepting would only end up highlighting one is not yet whole.

While we are not exactly talking about the same thing as for me it went beyond what a between my legs, the physical has always been a big issue for me.

Yes. Some similarities can exist even when stories differ.

Offline karen_A

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #44 on: July 27, 2020, 08:01:08 PM »
I don't have very much time because I need to work. My apologies if I'm not able to reply clearly enough.

No worries... I'm too tired to really reply to this in depth today.

Quote
I guess I've done what I can... and as I see Complete responded as well I perhaps should in this reply concern myself only with all else.

I've not see her post... I think things are better that way.

Quote
Did you find my description unclear? If so, please consider the relationship between yourself and your brother.
That relationship was a rocky one... BTW he died many years ago at the age of 32

Quote
Alternatively, think of those who have stayed by you as you cried, responding to your grief not with platitudes but with absolute honesty and concern?

If you see what I said as platitudes, then there is not much to talk about... and in any case I don't know you well enough to be very specific in any case. I think we all have cried at times because of having been born TS, I know I have... But I also learned along the  that when it comes to this, no one is completely objective and their "honesty" is mostly opinion.
Quote
Judging from your comment below it would appear you now not only wonder... but also suspect I may.

Yes I do... but there is no point going into it.

Quote
Does that change what I saw where I visited, how it made me feel, or the fact that you repeatedly responded to me by saying what you saw during your thirty years where you frequented differed? Or make your observations from back then more relevant to what mine have been in the present?

You never seem to take things as i intend them <sigh>... What I was saying is the the "community" has different factions and you just came across teh wrong ones for you ... Places like Susan's do not represent all on-libe TS communities ... What you wanted existed and I'm sure still exists, but mostly in private forums and mailing lists... I am no longer plugged into them because the ones i was on slowly faded away and I did not look for new ones.


Quote
I fail to understand the relevance of this to the subject at hand.

I fail to understand the relevance of this to the subject at hand.

Just showing where my thinking is at in general to maybe help you understand where I am coming from overall... My views are often not what people expect given my life.

Anyway I need to get to bed now.

Good night
-karen

Offline Maddie

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 93
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #45 on: July 27, 2020, 10:24:30 PM »
Good night Karen :D
Head up moving forward

Offline zirconia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #46 on: July 29, 2020, 07:45:21 PM »
Hi, Karen

Thanks again for replying. I noticed something on a reread just now that seems like a misinterpretation so I'd mostly just like to clarify that...

That relationship was a rocky one... BTW he died many years ago at the age of 32.

I'm sorry.

If you see what I said as platitudes, then there is not much to talk about... and in any case I don't know you well enough to be very specific in any case. I think we all have cried at times because of having been born TS, I know I have... But I also learned along the  that when it comes to this, no one is completely objective and their "honesty" is mostly opinion.

This part was about how I got to know Complete. And our relationship. Which I do not see as that of master and disciple. LOL.

This part was not about whether what I see your words as is teachings, truths, wisdom, platitudes, guidance, gospel, philosophy or whatever.

And... you were not by my side when I could do nothing but cry... but had you been, I hope I'm right in that you'd have said something other than what you've said during this conversation.

Because I'd already realized how impossible it would be to reconcile what I'd been clinging on to with my need and the way the world saw me. So these words would just have increased my agony. I already knew I could either try to continue (and wither), or accept that verdict (and maybe live). And since no-one gets to decide how others feel the final logic was simple.

So... if you feel any similarities between my thinking and Complete's are due to her being my master, I must gently repeat: You've acted more as such in this short while than she has during the entire time since we met.

Rather, perhaps I just am amazingly comfortable and at ease when with her exactly because we do think and feel similarly about so many things.

You never seem to take things as i intend them <sigh>... What I was saying is the the "community" has different factions and you just came across teh wrong ones for you ... Places like Susan's do not represent all on-libe TS communities ... What you wanted existed and I'm sure still exists, but mostly in private forums and mailing lists... I am no longer plugged into them because the ones i was on slowly faded away and I did not look for new ones.

Hmmm... OK. Sorry.

Had you said something like "Some people who think like you do exist... but they're mostly on private forums and mailing lists that are pretty hard to find" I'd probably have understood the first time around.

By the way... (and this question does stem from curiosity and laziness since I don't feel like searching for and joining those forums just for this) what percentage was motivated to transition by the need to have heterosexual sex? And how did they handle the situation before SRS?

I ask because I'm finding it increasingly hard to be prudent. LOL. And Complete only discovered men after she was healed.

Oh, and to set your mind at ease, I have always made sure the other party knows my limits and the reason... and will until I am made whole. ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶


I also look forward to your reply to the rest of my questions if/when you feel like it.

Edit: Grammar
« Last Edit: July 29, 2020, 11:31:38 PM by zirconia »

Offline zirconia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #47 on: July 30, 2020, 11:03:51 AM »
This might prove interesting for all bulletin boards that edit or censor content.

https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia_petition_for_rulemaking_7.27.20.pdf

Section 230(c)(1) does not immunize a platforms’ own speech, its own editorial decisions or comments, or its decisions to restrict access to content or its bar user from a platform. Second, section 230(c)(2) covers decisions to restrict content or remove users.

(snip)

To ensure clear and consistent interpretation of the “good faith” standard, NTIA requests that the FCC further add the below to newly requested 47 CFR Chapter I Subchapter E Section 130.02:
(e) “good faith”
A platform restricts access to or availability of specific material (including, without limitation, its scope or reach) by itself, any agent, or any unrelated party in “good faith” under 47 U.S.C. § (c)(2)(A) if it:
i. restricts access to or availability of material or bars or refuses service to any person consistent with publicly available terms of service or use that state plainly and with particularity the criteria the interactive computer service employs in its content-moderation practices, including by any partially or fully automated processes, and that are in effect on the date such content is first posted;
ii. has an objectively reasonable belief that the material falls within one of the listed categories set forth in 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(2)(A);
iii. does not restrict access to or availability of material on deceptive or pretextual grounds, and does not apply its terms of service or use to restrict access to or availability of material that is similarly situated to material that the interactive computer service intentionally declines to restrict; and
iv. supplies the interactive computer service of the material with timely notice describing with particularity the interactive computer service’s reasonable factual basis for the restriction of access and a meaningful opportunity to respond, unless the interactive computer service has an objectively reasonable belief that the content is related to criminal activity or such notice would risk imminent physical harm to others.


(snip)

For purposes of 47 U.S.C. § 230(f)(3), “responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information” includes substantively contributing to, modifying, altering, presenting or prioritizing with a reasonably discernible viewpoint, commenting upon, or editorializing about content provided by another information content provider.

(snip)

(c) An interactive computer service is not being “treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider” when it actually publishes its own or third-party content. Circumstances in which an interactive computer service actually publishes content include when:
(i) it affirmatively solicits or selects to display information or content either manually by the interactive computer service’s personnel or through use of an algorithm or any similar tool pursuant to a reasonably discernible viewpoint or message, without having been prompted to, asked to, or searched for by the user; and (ii) it reviews third-party content already displayed on the Internet and affirmatively vouches for, editorializes, recommends, or promotes such content to other Internet users on the basis of the content’s substance or messages. This paragraph applies to a review conducted, and a recommendation made, either manually by the interactive computer service’s personnel or through use of an algorithm or any similar tool.



Offline Kiera

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • Landed Airline Gentry . . "Get into which world?"
    • Blogs: Second Type Forums
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #48 on: July 30, 2020, 03:14:42 PM »
This might prove interesting for all bulletin boards that edit or censor content.

Found this as well a tad more "readable":
Quote from: Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship Issued on: May 28, 2020
         
          In particular, subparagraph (c)(2) expressly addresses protections from “civil liability” and specifies that an interactive computer service provider may not be made liable “on account of” its decision in “good faith” to restrict access to content that it considers to be “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable.”  It is the policy of the United States to ensure that, to the maximum extent permissible under the law, this provision is not distorted to provide liability protection for online platforms that — far from acting in “good faith” to remove objectionable content — instead engage in deceptive or pretextual actions (often contrary to their stated terms of service) to stifle viewpoints with which they disagree.

Offline karen_A

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #49 on: Yesterday at 08:56:24 AM »

And... you were not by my side when I could do nothing but cry... but had you been, I hope I'm right in that you'd have said something other than what you've said during this conversation.

While I am someone who tries not to be or sound cruel, I am someone who does not sugar coat things, either to myself or others. I say what I believe to be true, though I try to say it in a way that does not cause UNNECESSARY pain. And if it looks like what I say won't really be considered I don't bother, which why I did not go into what I mentioned earlier.

Quote
So... if you feel any similarities between my thinking and Complete's are due to her being my master, I must gently repeat: You've acted more as such in this short while than she has during the entire time since we met.

That is in the eye of the beholder,  I guess, as I don't see things that way nor intended them to be.


Quote
By the way... (and this question does stem from curiosity and laziness since I don't feel like searching for and joining those forums just for this) what percentage was motivated to transition by the need to have heterosexual sex? And how did they handle the situation before SRS?

The ones for whom that was an immediate driving force were mostly pretty young (I have no idea how old you are... but for some reason I don't think you are in your early or mid 20's or younger), but it was not theonly factor... but a strong sex drive when young tends to be a significant push.

As to how they handled it, well all over the map. From refraining because they could not bear to be sexual with male genitalia , to finding a guy who could deal with such limitations, to finding one that could deal with the current physicality... And while some found men who would stick with them after SRS, it was not uncommon to hear that the guy loses interest and leaves after SRS regardless of what he said before...  In any case some happy endings but lot's of heartbreak too...

One thing to remember, no matter the passion at first, long term sex is not the most important thing in a relationship... and it can make one emotionally very vulnerable.

Pre-op it's very complicated it seems. I would have never contemplated it pre-op... If my marriage had failed 20 years ago, and I had passed well enough i certainly would have explored that path in depth. What exploring i did before I knew the marriage would survive let me know ...

But as I implied above, for me sex is not the most important thing about a relationship. Having a deep emotionally intimate bond is more important than a physical one or having sex at all IMO.

-Karen
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 02:00:36 PM by karen_A »

Offline Christine

  • Dena's Assistant
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 293
  • I'm "Friday" Mom's Bed Bud
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #50 on: Yesterday at 12:37:24 PM »
While I am someone who tries not to be or sound cruel, I am someone who does not sugar coat things, ether to myself or others. I say what I believe to be true, though I try to say it in a way that does not cause UNNECESSARY pain. And if it looks like what I say won't really be considered I don't bother, which why I did not go into what I mentioned earlier.
.
One thing to remember, no matter the passion at first, long term sex is not the most important thing in a relationship... and it can make one emotionally very vulnerable.
.
But as I implied above, for me sex is not the most important thing about a relationship. Having a deep emotionally intimate bond is more important than a physical one or having sex at all IMO.

-Karen

@karen_A
Hi Karen,                  02 August 2020

Thank you so much for your beautiful comments. Years ago, for me it was sex and only sex. Eventually, I figured out sex was only a very small part of a relationship. A Deep and Loving Emotional Bond is What Truly Matters the Most; it is What will Insure the Relationship Endures.

God Bless You Young Lady and Thank You Again!

Best Always, Love

Christine
Worrying Never Makes It Better.
Contact:
Christine@transhaven.org

Offline Complete

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 259
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #51 on: Yesterday at 06:49:32 PM »
Since we are all now getting along so "lovingly", (except for Karen, who finds me offensive and won't read my posts), perhaps someone might decipher the following quote for me
From Karen:
Quote
While we are not exactly talking about the same thing as for me it went beyond what a between my legs, the physical has always been a big issue for me.

So the first thing that confuses me is the statement/assertion that  "the physical has always been a big issue for me, preceded by the seemingly contradictory statement that "for me it went beyond what a between my legs"[/].
Maybe l just a little bit too normal, but is not what's between your legs, quintessentially PHYSICAL???
Karen then goes on to propound that ,
Quote
Having a deep emotionally intimate bond is more important than a physical one or having sex at all.
So is this asexual intimacy something like one shares with a sibling, or a parent, or maybe even a spiritual guru or master?
I mean, if this is the case, if the goal is a non-physical, non-sexual intimacy, why go through all the pain and suffering involved in physically transforming one's physical body???

Offline zirconia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Zirconia just joined the Susan's Permaban Club!
« Reply #52 on: Yesterday at 08:59:51 PM »
Hi, Karen

While I am someone who tries not to be or sound cruel, I am someone who does not sugar coat things, either to myself or others. I say what I believe to be true, though I try to say it in a way that does not cause UNNECESSARY pain. And if it looks like what I say won't really be considered I don't bother, which why I did not go into what I mentioned earlier.

It's good to hear you don't sugar coat things. That's what put me so at ease about Complete. That—and of course the fact that she understood exactly how I felt and why. It felt amazing to talk with someone like that after listening to all the theory and dogma that overflowed on the forums.

That is in the eye of the beholder,  I guess, as I don't see things that way nor intended them to be.

Yes... it is in the eye of the beholder. The way you approach and explain things is very similar to how my favorite teacher led us to solve problems in class. But of course both he and we had the same textbooks. The main difference I feel is that in this case you have your thirty years of online experience to draw on, and I only my own story. Plus of course the confusion caused by the fact that it did not at all seem to match what I found on the forums.

The ones for whom that was an immediate driving force were mostly pretty young (I have no idea how old you are... but for some reason I don't think you are in your early or mid 20's or younger), but it was not theonly factor... but a strong sex drive when young tends to be a significant push.

Hmmmm.... interesting. I only felt antipathy toward sex until I was prescribed estradiol. While men had approached me before, and it did feel nice I hadn't even seriously thought of responding. But that changed Very Quickly... LOL.

As to how they handled it, well all over the map. From refraining because they could not bear to be sexual with male genitalia , to finding a guy who could deal with such limitations, to finding one that could deal with the current physicality... And while some found men who would stick with them after SRS, it was not uncommon to hear that the guy loses interest and leaves after SRS regardless of what he said before...  In any case some happy endings but lot's of heartbreak too...

That sounds not too different, then. I'm glad to say that even throughout passion I've been treated very gently and considerately. Although I must not be the only one frustrated by the inability to consummate. Still... my body sings just thinking of every touch.

But, once again, it's getting ever harder to retain the boundaries. And that's mainly what I was interested in hearing about.

One thing to remember, no matter the passion at first, long term sex is not the most important thing in a relationship... and it can make one emotionally very vulnerable.

To me the combination of vulnerability and feeling of absolute safety is what makes it so lovely. But of course that's just me.

Pre-op it's very complicated it seems. I would have never contemplated it pre-op... If my marriage had failed 20 years ago, and I had passed well enough i certainly would have explored that path in depth. What exploring i did before I knew the marriage would survive let me know ...

But as I implied above, for me sex is not the most important thing about a relationship. Having a deep emotionally intimate bond is more important than a physical one or having sex at all IMO.

Hmmmm... now that my body's awakened, I really can't imagine not needing sex. But from what I've heard, with the right partner it does develop into an even more deep thing... not merely physical, but something even more fulfilling. I hope I'll find someone who can give me that, and to whom I can also offer the same. Even now, even knowing that the love I've experienced cannot be permanent or even lasting, the closeness is incredible. I can only imagine what it may be like once I'm made whole.


So the first thing that confuses me is the statement/assertion that  "the physical has always been a big issue for me, preceded by the seemingly contradictory statement that "for me it went beyond what a between my legs".
Maybe l just a little bit too normal, but is not what's between your legs, quintessentially PHYSICAL???

(snip)

So is this asexual intimacy something like one shares with a sibling, or a parent, or maybe even a spiritual guru or master?
I mean, if this is the case, if the goal is a non-physical, non-sexual intimacy, why go through all the pain and suffering involved in physically transforming one's physical body???

Complete,

I think I may understand Karen some. What she describes sounds a bit similar to what I felt like before hormones. I saw both girls and boys as just friends... some closer than others. The really close ones felt as close as family... but with no real sexual motivation on my side. Although I could perform if I really felt I needed to to make the other person happy. But I didn't at all understand erotic attraction. The maleness of my body revolted me.

So the closeness had to be emotional. Since my body was wrong, even if the other party was attracted to me it could never truly be physical.

It always comes back to the fact that we all are different, doesn't it? Some are not at all into sex, and some are. I'd never have believed how much I like belonging to the second group until it actually happened... LOL